Why Trump Should Call Putin’s Bluff Now

Why Trump Should Call Putin’s Bluff Now

Henry Kissinger wrote that “a bluff taken seriously is more useful than a serious threat interpreted as a bluff.” It is well past time to call Vladimir Putin’s bluff.  President Donald Trump’s response to the highly-anticipated release of the Russia-Ukraine peace proposal, led by the U.K., France, Germany, and Ukraine, indicates how wide the gap between the two warring parties really is. Land concessions in Ukrainian-held territories, control of the Donbas region, security assurances, and autonomy over military capacity still seem to plague negotiations. [time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”] The standstill should come as no surprise. The Russian President has refused to publicly share what he could accept or reject in the U.S.’s 28-point peace plan—which directly drew from Russia’s own documents—after a five-hour negotiating session with Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. Many foreign government officials view the U.S. plan as heavily favoring Russia and something that the Ukrainians or Europeans would never accept.  Therein lies the trouble. Putin wants even more than the generous starting point established by the Trump Administration. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has his priorities but is willing to make concessions through constructive negotiations—although a seat at the table would be a good start. While Trump seems to believe that Russia is “much stronger” than Ukraine, the truth is that most of the Russian landmass is uninhabitable, their economy is disintegrating, and their military prowess is inferior to that of Ukraine with the backing of its allies. Russia is overplaying its hand Trump’s perception of…

Continue reading →

 

Want more insights? Join Grow With Caliber - our career elevating newsletter and get our take on the future of work delivered weekly.